Search for: "Dynamic Devices LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2022, 5:00 pm
  From the folks at Global SWF LLC, a new report that is worth reading--The 2022 Annual Report: State Owned Investors 3.0. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by wadminw
Another very dynamic game that is gaining momentum on the websites of bookmakers, where more than a hundred different competitions take place every day. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:39 pm
” The agency, however, pledged to continue monitoring the use of standard essential patents (SEPs) in the wireless device industry. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 2:06 pm by Angel Reyes
These apps work by tracking your location through the smartphone's GPS device and feeding traffic data for that location into a map. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:50 am by Vincent LoTempio
Cathas Advanced Technologies LLC is suing Expedia, Apple and Amazon in three different lawsuits for methods and storage mediums regarding communications, Web applications and marketing related services. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:07 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,741,877 entitled Device and Method for Determining Analyte Levels and owned by Dexcom, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:07 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,741,877 entitled Device and Method for Determining Analyte Levels and owned by Dexcom, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,835,757 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING INFORMATION TO A TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DEVICE and owned by Wireless Science, LLC. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,835,757 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING INFORMATION TO A TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DEVICE and owned by Wireless Science, LLC. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm by Florian Mueller
., granular evidence that consumers buy an accused device specifically because of a patented feature). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:56 am by James L. Higgins
The Court explained that although it "did not ultimately adopt Adobe’s constructions for [the terms ‘output device’ and ‘pictorial dynamic range’] . . . the fact that Adobe asserted reasonable constructions under which its products would not infringe precludes a finding that the first prong of Seagate is satisfied. [read post]