Search for: "Dyson George"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On the same day, there was a trial of a preliminary issue on meaning and comment in the libel case of Dyson v Channel 4 before HHJ Lewis. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
The historian George Dyson has written that a Google engineer once said to him: “We are not scanning all those books to be read by people. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the position of Barry George, who, along with JUSTICE, was granted permission to intervene). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
The High Court in Belfast has struck out the libel claim brought by former IRA member, Gerry Kelly, against writer Malachi O’Doherty in relation to two 2019 interviews in which he alleged that the claimant had shot a police officer in the head during the 1983 Maze prison escape. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
The UK Government has taken steps to investigate The Telegraph Media Group’s proposed purchase by Redbird IMI, an Abu Dhabi-backed group. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On 1 February 2024, Steyn J dismissed the application to amend the Claim Form and struck out the existing claim in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2024] EWHC 173 (KB). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
On Tuesday 5 December 2023 there was a hearing before Fancourt J in the case of Various Claimants v NGN dealing with consequentials following the settlement of all the claims listed for hearing in January 2024. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Former MP George Osborne has called in police after a “malicious” email was sent out to wedding guests days before his marriage to Thea Rogers. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 8:19 am
But schools with 10 or more law profs on this list include: Boston College, Boston University, University of British Columbia, Cardozo, Colorado, Emory, Fordham, George Washington, Georgetown, Georgia, Harvard, Houston, Indiana Maurer, Indiana McKinney, Miami, Nebraska, University of New South Wales (Australia), Northwestern, NYU, Ohio State, Ottawa, Pace, Penn State, Rutgers, SMU, St. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On Monday 9 October 2023 Johnson J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Happy New Year to all Inforrm readers! [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has reversed its decision not to allow a claim against Meta alleging abuse of its market dominance to progress. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 20 July 2022, the Government published its Response to the Call for Evidence on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation [pdf]. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
On 5 February 2020 Nicol J handed down the judgement in the trial of preliminary issues Dyson v Associated Newspapers [2020] EWHC 188 (QB) in which he found in favour of the claimant. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
On Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 February 2024, the High Court heard an appeal against the 2023 decision to deny Julian Assange permission to appeal his extradition order. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
