Search for: "E.D. v. Pfizer, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Supp.2d 1324, 1345 n.16 (E.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2011 WL 904161 (E.D. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Pfizer, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004); McCombs v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
Pfizer, Inc., 253 F.R.D. 11, 16-17 (D. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2000 WL 1099884, at *2 & n.1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Danek Medical, Inc., 1999 WL 1054864, *6 (M.D. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004) (dictum also extends rule to medical devices). [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Pfizer, Inc., 356 F.3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Zymar Senju Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Pfizer Inc., 249 F.R.D. 248, 254-55 (E.D. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:22 am
Pfizer, 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (same; physician considered warning inappropriate) (applying California law).Under these facts, if Conte were an ordinary prescription drug product liability case, plaintiff would have been out of court and out of luck, just like Motus. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 2007 WL 969431 (N.Y. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
E.D. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:24 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
Pfizer, Inc., 384 F. [read post]
