Search for: "EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch" Results 1 - 20 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2019, 6:16 pm by Nassiri Law
Coca-Cola is a close second at $200 million, Novartis in third at $183 million, Morgan & Stanley fourth at $150 million and Abercrombie & Fitch rounding out the top five at $90 million. [read post]
In a case against Abercrombie & Fitch, for example, the Supreme Court found the retailer discriminated against an applicant who wore a hijab to her job interview when it refused to hire her because she was wearing the Islamic head covering. [read post]
In a case against Abercrombie & Fitch, for example, the Supreme Court found the retailer discriminated against an applicant who wore a hijab to her job interview when it refused to hire her because she was wearing the Islamic head covering. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:04 am by Joy Waltemath
Also rejected was the EEOC’s argument, relying on Abercrombie & Fitch, that Kellogg could not accommodate a religious observance with a neutral policy available to any employee wanting a day off for any reason. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Abercrombie & Fitch (2015), which increased the protection given to a Muslim wearing a head scarf; and Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]