Search for: "EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 9:12 am by Gregory Schmitz
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14–86, 575 U.S. ____ (Jun. 1, 2015). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., which made our list as one of our five issues to watch for 2015. [read post]
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. rejected the Tenth Circuit’s holding that, to prove discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), it is an applicant’s burden to advise an employer of a religious practice necessitating accommodation. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., a case involving an employee who wore a headscarf (or "hijab") to work for religious reasons, but was told to remove because it conflicted with Abercrombie's clothing policy. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers "may not make an applicant's religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]