Search for: "EEOC v. Financial Assur., Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2016, 1:03 pm
Broward County and EEOC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
The motions have been filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation ("Ambac") (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 6:45 am
LVI Services, Inc., a summary order decided on October 15. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:49 am
The employee’s sexual orientation discrimination claims also survived, even though she did not tell the supervisor who decided to fire her that she was “gay” or “lesbian,” because a jury could conclude that her supervisor inferred she was a lesbian based on her comments that she had an “alternative lifestyle” and did not “date men” (Benussi v UBS Financial Services, Inc, February 13, 2014, Crotty, P). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 6:57 am
According to the employee, this was in retaliation for her EEOC charge and lawsuit and the defendants intended her wife’s termination to cause continued financial and emotional hardship. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Trees, Inc.). [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
EEOC, Green v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:34 am
About Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
See, e.g., Rehrs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
The suit also names UnitedHealth Group Inc. and Oxford Health Plans LLC, who have acquired Health Net. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
