Search for: "EEOC v. Ford Motor Company" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
An 8-5 decision from (these days) one of the nation’s more liberal circuits in EEOC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Brian Hall
By Brian Hall Almost a year ago, we wrote that a panel of the Sixth Circuit in EEOC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 7:04 am
When Carolyn Upshaw started filing EEOC charges against her employer, Ford Motor Company, it began to document her on-going performance problems. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:44 am by Richard S. Zackin
Ford Motor Co., a case in which the agency brought suit on behalf of a Ford employee who alleged she was terminated in retaliation for filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:00 am by Walter Olson
Ford Motor Company, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that a former Ford employee could proceed to a trial on her claim that the company was required to allow her to telecommute on a regular basis. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Jamie LaPlante
Ford Motor Company and revived the EEOC’s lawsuit on behalf of a fired Ford worker with irritable bowel syndrome. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:52 pm by Pierre Bergeron
Ford Motor Company granting rehearing en banc in the case and vacating the panel decision. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:49 am by Richard S. Zackin
Ford Motor Co., in which the panel held that the EEOC was entitled to a jury trial on its claim that Ford discharged an employee in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) after it denied her request to work from home 4 days per week as an accommodation for her irritable bowel syndrome (“IBS”). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:25 am
Ford Motor Company, No. 08-3246 (6th Circuit 2009), the Court was faced with, among other things, the question of whether the plaintiff, Carolyn Upshaw, had established a prima facie case in support of her claim that the defendant, Ford Motor Company, had retaliated against her by firing her because she had filed numerous EEOC charges and a lawsuit against it. [read post]