Search for: "EEOC v. Preferred Management Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
PRC Race Suit According to EEOC’s complaint in EEOC v PRC Industries, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The EEOC Ruling in Complainant v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Finding too that the bulk of the incidents alleged to constitute reprisal for his complaints of discrimination did not amount to materially adverse employment actions, the court also disposed of the employee’s retaliation claims (Cotton v Costco Wholesale Corp, January 3, 2014, Lungstrum, J). [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:34 am
One of the more infamous examples of the legal risks faced by companies who use staffing agency employees is Vizcaino v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:04 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
Also, although she had never met the HR manager before the asserted harassment began and had never discussed her sexual preference with her, the HR manager asked the employee about her sexuality when the employee complained about these violations, leaving her to infer that her sexuality was an issue with upper management. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:10 am
Fontainebleau Corp. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:47 am
"Indiana follows Ultramares Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp, No. 08-60502 (5th Cir. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
One example of this commitment to this priority is the brief the Labor Department filed in Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 23, 2009)Easterbrook writes to enforces an EEOC subpoena but questions EEOC's prudence8th Circuit>> King v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
General Motors Corp 6th Affirms Pro Se $120,000 Employment Discrimination VerdictMadden v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
