Search for: "EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY &C. v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court)… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
Smith Jr. and Todd W. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
In Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
In Young v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
Smith, THE SMITH APPELLATE LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Drouillard. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
In Smith v City of Jackson, the Court found disparate impact claims cognizable under the ADEA, but held there is no liability when the impact is due to reasonable factors other than age. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York State… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York State… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Definition of employer/employee—SCt seems to follow my lead by looking at the Restatement of Agency for vicarious liability. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:48 am
., Martin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
In her petition, Smith asks the justices to review these holdings and potentially, if the law is generally applicable, to revisit the prevailing standard from Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
