Search for: "Eastman v. Eastman"
Results 1 - 20
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
" Alito renewed that grievance just last month, writing gratuitously after agreeing with the Court's decision not to hear a case involving anti-LGBTQ+ bias that the appellate ruling at hand "exemplifies the danger that I anticipated in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
David Eastman and former Rep. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Way back in May, I cracked wise about the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) fictional “Bureau of Let’s Sue Meta,” noting that the commission’s proposal (really, an “order to show cause”) to modify its 2020 settlement of a consumer-protection matter with what had then been Facebook—in other words, a settlement modifying a 2012 settlement—was the FTC’s third enforcement action with Meta in the first half of 2023. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
California – Judge Finds Eastman Culpable for Ethics Breaches in 2020 Bid to Keep Trump in Power MSN &nd [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Waterfront Comm'n (1964) and Kastigar v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm
Verdun v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:44 am
V. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Judge McAfee captioned his order as “State of Georgia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallI had an existential crisis in the Spring of 2012, just a few months before the hugely important Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm
One of them—Eastman—is a person I knew for many years in his capacity as a law professor; but I should emphasize (in case prosecutors are reading this!) [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
And his emails to Eastman and Giuliani subsequently first proposed a Senate hearing “with at least two highly qualified legal scholars concluding that the President of the Senate is solely responsible for counting the votes, and that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional in dictating limits on debate and dictating who wins electoral votes when [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
Oh wait, that was Eastman too. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
