Search for: "Eastman v. United States of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
Perhaps by rushing the United States Capitol to seize control and prevent it from complying with the Constitution and rulings of the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Consider the reforms of Solon and then of Cleisthenes in Athens, the outcome of the Social War in Rome, and of course the Reconstruction Amendments, the expansion of the franchise to women, and similar moments in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
But it won't be able to counterbalance the support Epic received from 35 states, Microsoft, the EFF, and America's most cited and most authoritative antitrust law professor. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Eastman, 92 So. 3d 666 (Miss. 2012); Dependable Abrasives, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
Customs and Border Protection, and Alex Eastman, the senior medical officer for operations in the DHS office of countering weapons of mass destruction. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
Key Findings The cost basis of property transferred at death receives a “step-up” in basis to its fair market value. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
The three-step screening we’ve developed across the United States, which includes county, federal and multi-state checks, has set a new standard.... [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:09 am
Océ North America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Eastman Chem. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Wellman sued Eastman Chemical for infringement. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
