Search for: "Edison v. Scott"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Con Edison v Northeast Utilities[1], a 2005 Second Circuit decision regarding a New York law governed merger agreement, found that, absent clear contractual language to the contrary, a target company could not collect lost shareholder premium as damages for the breach of a merger agreement. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Con Edison v Northeast Utilities[1], a 2005 Second Circuit decision regarding a New York law governed merger agreement, found that, absent clear contractual language to the contrary, a target company could not collect lost shareholder premium as damages for the breach of a merger agreement. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:07 pm
Law Lessons from JOHN SCOTT KAROLCHYK v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
SCOTT BARRY, App. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:39 am
Oil v Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, 57 NY2d 574, 579-580 (1982); Rector, Church Wardens & Vestrymen of St. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Wolf v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 4:29 pm
Law Lessons from SCOTT GALE V. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:06 am
SCOTT BARRY, App. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
" Consolidated Edison, 305 U.S. at 229. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:19 am
Scott, 251 N.J. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Edison International. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:02 am
Scott, 251 N.J. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 am
Scott, 251 N.J. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:25 am
In Jay Alix, as assignee of AlixPartners, LLP v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
See Scott v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
Edison Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Scott, 251 N.J. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm
David Kline Gaby Longsworth Scott A. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Menard v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Edison. [read post]