Search for: "Edmonds v. Edmonds" Results 141 - 160 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:54 am
Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 228 [1986]; see Edmonds v City of Yonkers, 294 AD2d 330 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 612 [2002]). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:54 pm
Let's say I want to refer to the joint opinion of Justices O'Connor, Kennedy, and Souter in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:19 pm
As Judge Edmond Chang of the Northern District of Illinois considered whether the plaintiff's case properly belonged in state court, he referred to a very recent, similar case, Spoerle v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Mueller, the court writes, is an inferior officer under the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Suffolk County, Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Suffolk County Police Department, Michael Delgado, Joseph Quatela, Edmond Coppa, Individually and Edmond Coppa Photography, Raymond L. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:28 pm
Edmonds, 52 F.3d 1236 (3rd Cir. 1995), vacated in part on other grounds, 80 F.3d 810 (3rd Cir. 1996). [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
Yesterday the DC Circuit released Caneisha Mills v. [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]