Search for: "Edward McNeil"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Why compulsory licenses are bad: a look at the sausage making process: (Techdirt) More on ACTA: (LawFont.com) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Brand Finance 500: the annual report on the world’s most valuable brands: (IP finance), Gretchen Olive’s ‘10 steps to an effective domain name policy’: (IPwar’s), ICANN approves GNSO proposals imposing financial penalty on registrars who engage in excessive domain… [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharm., 682 F. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
., 423 N.E.2d 831, 834, 836-37 (Ohio 1981).Oklahoma: Edwards v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
To the contrary, Edward Wasserman, dean of Grad School of Journalism at Berkeley: accelerating towards more sponsored content will only deepen confusion and intensify mistrust. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
andnbsp;SECURITIES ARBITRATION OUTLINE andamp; READING MATERIALS 1.andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Arbitration andndash; Overview andldquo;Equity is justice in that it goes beyond the written law. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Ortho-McNeil (?) [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Ortho-McNeil (?) [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
