Search for: "Edwards v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 4,530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm by Florian Mueller
But there's no such thing as a war without functional weapons, and neither a U.S. case brought by Lenovo and its Motorola Mobility subsidiary nor Deutsche Telekom's German complaint have impressed the courts of law:Earlier this month, Judge Edward J. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
Edward-Isaac Dovere reports for CNN. [read post]
., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
The court, for example, unanimously struck down a California law in Edward v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:20 am
By Jeffrey Karp, Senior Counsel, and Edward Mahaffey, Legal Research and Writing Attorney On June 30, 2022, the United States Supreme Court struck down the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Clean Power Plan ("CPP"), limiting the agency's authority to address climate change, in the case West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]