Search for: "Edwards v. Super*"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2019, 8:06 pm
Applying compensation limitations retroactivelyPeople v Edward J. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
App. 2018), the court rejected a “reasonableness” approach to employee non-solicitation provisions, emphasizing the plain language of section 16600 and the California Supreme Court’s decision in Edwards v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Is there is any difference between the public interest and the interest of the public? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:00 am
The case, Terranova et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Emily Watkins, Damon Dawain Edwards, Edward J. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
(For more on this, see the Supreme Court in Edwards v Kumarasamy [2016] UKSC 40 – our note ). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff received the Albert Lasker Clinical Medical Research Award for his work on the clinical trial of isoniazid to treat tuberculosis, along with Walsh McDermott and Carl Muschenheim, of the Hoffmann-La Roche Research Laboratories, and Edward H. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
Steven Edwards, No. 117,305 (Sedgwick)Sentencing appeal and motion to withdraw pleaJennifer C. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
See Den-Tal-EZ v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Professor Rothman is also well known for his advocacy for the superiority of confidence intervals over p-values in conveying important information about what range of values are reasonably compatible with the observed data.3 His criticisms of p-values and his advocacy for estimation with intervals have pushed biomedical publishing to embrace confidence intervals as more informative than just p-values. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall famously wrote in McCulloch v. [read post]
