Search for: "Electrical Workers v. Labor Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
The CARES Act is intended, in part, to provide small businesses some much needed relief in dealing with significant revenue shortages and the incentive to maintain existing workforces so as not to further compound the economic impact on American workers. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
At issue in Cleveland Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
In Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
Without any scrutiny of the scientific bona fides of the workers’ compensation agency, the appellate court acquiesced in Nicholson’s self-serving characterization of his Report as having been reviewed by “cooperating researchers” and the Panel of the Ontario Workers’ Compensation agency. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:29 am
DeBartolo Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff sat for the university entrance boards in Scotland. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am
On this framework, in 2006, in the Labor Board held that a private project labor agreement between the Glen Falls Building & Construction Trades Council and a private developer of a co-generation electric power plant violated Section 8(e).Glens Falls Bldg. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am
On this framework, in 2006, in the Labor Board held that a private project labor agreement between the Glen Falls Building & Construction Trades Council and a private developer of a co-generation electric power plant violated Section 8(e).Glens Falls Bldg. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm
The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:31 am
LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am
The successor’s use of the employer’s intangible assets—its name, goodwill, trademarks, customer data, trade secrets, phone numbers, and websites—plus its retention of principals to promote the successor to customers, weighed heavily in favor of successor liability (Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Benefit Fund v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm
National Labor Relations Board 16-1370 Issues: (1) Whether, under NLRB v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
The certified fiscal plan is the very touchstone of the Title III proceeding — and Section 201 of PROMESA sets forth 14 requirements that a fiscal plan must meet in order to be certified by the oversight board. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm
Estate of Morris Blackburn (10th Cir., May 23, 2017) (affirming Black Lung Benefits compensation claim and denying petition for review: the Labor Benefits Review Board did not err in affirming the award below)*Hays v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:38 am
Member Pearce filed a separate dissenting opinion (Local 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), AFL–CIO (Paramount Industries, Inc.), February 10, 2017). [read post]
