Search for: "Elizabeth Chang"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 8:12 am
"Writes Elizabeth Spiers in "What Hillary Clinton Got Wrong About Student Protesters" (NYT).What did Hillary say that Spiers deemed wrong? [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
(It used to be 4 years, but the law recently changed to shorten that window.) [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Tony's charge that I've flip-flopped is based on a 2019 blog post in which I defended then presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren's work in Dow Corning, which Tony thinks is a non-consensual non-debtor release case. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:37 pm
A closer reading of the judgment suggests that, despite Warner’s victory, little has changed in the law’s view of protest. [read post]
8 May 2024, 10:45 pm
Gavin Newsom reluctantly approved the changes with a nudge from the White House after farmworkers led a weekslong march to the state Capitol. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:57 am
Edited by Cathy Feldman, Coby Turner, and Elizabeth Levy [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and Administrator Anne Milgram, from Senator Elizabeth Warren, et al. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am
Carissima Mathen, Elizabeth McCarty, and Yvonne Fiamengo are joining the Superior Court of Justice.In Quebec, Catherine Dagenais is joining the Superior Court.Michael Battista and Catherine Moore are joining the Federal Court.And Sophie Matte is joining the Tax Court.📖 It’s worth reading Ian Holloway’s reflections on his deanship at the University of Calgary and changes to the legal profession. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
Ecclesiastical Law Society At the AGM of the Society yesterday, Lee Coley was elected as Chair in succession to Elizabeth Wilson. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
However, if my analysis is correct, that could change. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal Ex-Congressman Asks 11th Circuit to Toss Six-Figure Campaign Finance Penalty Courthouse News Service – Kayla Gogging | Published: 4/16/2024 Former U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
§ 1512) says in (c)(1) that tampering with or destroying evidence (or attempting to do so) is a crime, while (c)(2) (which follows the word "or," not "and") specifies that a person who "otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so," can also be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison.Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar did a great job of explaining that "or otherwise" clearly means in some other way NOT… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:41 am
By Jim Cline In Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Examiner Elizabeth Snyder found that the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (Employer) unilaterally changed working conditions for two Washington Federation of State Employees (Union) employees when it removed their new positions from the bargaining unit. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:15 pm
”Judge Elizabeth Hill questioned the motion. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argues for the Department of Justice. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
If you live in one of our biggest cities—in Dallas or Houston—nothing should change: You'll likely still appear before a judge who lives in your community. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
In his dissent, Justice Abe Fortas said that “the essential constitutional defect here is the same as in Robinson, for, in both cases, the particular defendant was accused of being in a condition which he had no capacity to change or avoid. [read post]
