Search for: "Elizabeth Joh"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
These private surveillance companies have an undue influence over police, argues Elizabeth E. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 11:49 am
UPDATE: On a related note, Elizabeth Joh has an interesting piece considering some technologies that might reduce the role of police discretion in traffic stops. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Elizabeth Joh The year 2015 witnessed a dramatic rise in demands for police surveillance machines. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
But as commentators like Elizabeth Joh point out, officers can still exercise discretion with widespread, automatic surveillance systems by focusing those systems on particular people or groups of people.More cities will likely attempt to adopt wider, more technologically sophisticated surveillance systems as time goes on and as the technology becomes more accessible. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
Joh predicted a variation on the idea. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm
__________________________ [1] For instance, like Elizabeth Joh, Cooper notes that at least automated errors are not the product of bias. [2] For a rigorous look at what laws can and cannot be rendered machine-readable, see new work by Harry Surden. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 10:51 am
These apps are part of the larger landscape that law professor Elizabeth Joh calls “networked surveillance ecosystems. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:03 pm
Elizabeth Joh noted the potential for the court's order to effect the law governing expectations of privacy in abandoned DNA (which is what interested me in this case in the first place). [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Applying the Fourth Amendment to placing calls from a locked phone to identify its owner
22 Jun 2016, 5:45 am
And thanks to Elizabeth Joh’s Twitter feed for the link. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 11:58 am
Many legal scholars—Neil Katyal, Elizabeth Joh, Edward Cheng—have instead argued for more regulation by architecture on the basis that it is less discriminatory or more effective. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:40 pm
“The Undue Influence of Surveillance Technology Companies on Policing” — Elizabeth Joh’s paper discusses the ways in which private companies that produce surveillance technologies (such as “StingRays”, body cameras, or big data software) have an undue, secretive influence on the traditionally public policy decisions made by police departments. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
Amy KapczynskiIn April, Jack Balkin, Yochai Benkler and I convened a workshop on the law and political economy of technology at Yale Law School. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:28 am
“At some point, the government investigation becomes indistinguishable from the crime, and we should ask whether that’s OK,” said Elizabeth Joh, a University of California Davis law professor who has studied undercover investigations. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:57 am
This point was part of Elizabeth Joh’s condemnation of the FBI’s conduct. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
H/T Elizabeth Joh [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:41 am
” Elizabeth Joh, a criminal law professor at the University of California, Davis, told Ars that this situation was alarming. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:27 am
As law professor Elizabeth Joh told The New Republic: Do you realize, for example, that when you upload your DNA, you're potentially becoming a genetic informant on the rest of your family? [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 10:45 am
Policy Manager, Access Now Eva Galperin: Global Policy Analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation Jennifer Granick: Director of Civil Liberties at The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School Riana Pfefferkorn: Cryptography Fellow at The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School Susan Hennessey: Fellow in National Security in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution and Managing Editor of Lawfare Katie Moussouris: Cybersecurity Fellow at the New America… [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
On Wednesday 9 May 2018 MP’s in the House of Common voted against the implementation of a data protection version of Part Two of the Leveson Inquiry by way on an amendment to the Data Protection Bill. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
