Search for: "Emert v State" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Failure to adequately investigate and present available defense challenging State’s central theory of case is ineffective assistance of counsel requiring new trial.
13 Oct 2021, 1:46 pm by Clayton Perkins
Skepnek, of The Sader Law Firm, of Kansas City, Missouri, and Kevin Babbit, of Fagan & Emert, LLC, of Lawrence, Kansas won in State v. [read post]
Kansas Defenders - http://kansasdefenders.blogspot.com/
The People Who Sued Themselves
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am by Kevin
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
Lowering the Bar - http://www.loweringthebar.net/
CAFC on obviousness-type double-patenting
14 Nov 2008, 11:31 pm
In General Foods Corp. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
AstraZeneca Loses Over Double-Patenting of Toprol-XL ® Ingredient
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
Astra offers no convincing reason why Emert does not apply.2 See also Geneva Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
Patent Baristas - http://www.patentbaristas.com
CAFC in In re Hubbell
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Perricone v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/