Search for: "Employees' Retirement v. Brown"
Results 1 - 20
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am
BROWN, Appellant v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Public employee not always entitled to a name-clearing hearingBrown v Simmons, 478 F.3d 922The lesson in Brown v Simmons is that a public employee is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing to rebut statements of a defamatory nature except when he or she has been terminated by the employer. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:57 am
Brown was a lawyer for the Connecticut comptroller, providing legal advice to the retirement commission. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:55 pm
Mark Hess, a partner in our Los Angeles office and an attorney who specializes in employee benefits, wrote an article on Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDRO's) and an interesting 5th Circuit case, Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:25 am
The 9th Circuit disagreed with a 2010 decision by the 6th Circuit in Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 11:16 am
In Fred Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 2:00 am
Lammers are attorneys with Frost Brown Todd LLC. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:41 pm
Burke v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit had held in Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:52 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm
(County of Riverside v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm
Clemon urged Biden not to nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court in light of her decision in Ross v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:43 pm
Northwestern University, No. 19-1401, to address the pleading standard that applies to breach of fiduciary duty claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
Concerning name-clearing hearingsBrowne v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 04583, Decided on May 25, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department [Browne II]In general, a name-clearing hearing is to provide an employee who claims that he or she has been “stigmatized” by his or her employer with an opportunity to clear his or her name* The individual seeking such a hearing has the burden of proof in the proceeding.Typically the individual seeks a name-clearing… [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/04/06/fact-sheet-middle-class-economics-strengthening-retirement-security [v]Hayashi Y. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:50 pm
McIntyre to Retire from Fourth Appellate DistrictMay 12, 2016SAN DIEGO—Associate Justice James A. [read post]
