Search for: "Employer Benefit Services, Ltd."
Results 81 - 100
of 624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2020, 6:39 am
Policy Benefits The arbitrator had to weigh the staff’s right to privacy against the potential benefits of the policy. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
In Newbound v Thames Water Utilities Ltd, the Court of Appeal has restored an Employment Tribunal’s decision that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed for a breach of his employer’s health and safety procedures. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:53 pm
Some of these laws impose new prohibitions on employers, while others provide positive benefits such as safe harbors, cure provisions, and employer incentives for reclassification of certain independent contractors. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 4:00 pm
Fred Deeley Imports Ltd. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
Groves’ pre-sale employment service could not be waived or released for the purpose of calculating ESA entitlements (at para 41). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:33 am
This ranges from 1-8 weeks, depending on the length of the employee’s service. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
Outplacement Services: Sometimes, an employer may offer outplacement services as part of the severance package. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:44 am
The Supreme Court of Canada's recent ruling in IBM Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
If any benefits are provided by an outside third-party then the employer may want to make sure to state in the contract that the employee’s rights under these benefit plans shall be determined entirely by the terms and conditions of the plans and the employee shall have no independent rights as against the employer in connection with the said benefits. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
If any benefits are provided by an outside third-party then the employer may want to make sure to state in the contract that the employee’s rights under these benefit plans shall be determined entirely by the terms and conditions of the plans and the employee shall have no independent rights as against the employer in connection with the said benefits. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:52 am
We can help determine if you are eligible to receive compensation from the (VCF) or health benefits from the World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 10:32 pm
"It was never meant to be a shelter for practicing physicians who, acting in the scope of their employment, receive payment for their emergency services." [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm
The value provided to employers by these contractual obligations can be substantial, as the recent decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Phoenix Restorations Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Defined benefit plans use a formula to calculate the retirement allowance based on certain set factors such as age, years of service and salary. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 11:01 am
Teachers in Ontario are usually entitled to long term disability benefits (LTD) coverage through the Ontario Teachers Insurance Plan (OTIP). [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:14 am
After leaving his employment with Plaintiff, Biggs began working for Defendant OneLogin, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California, which also provides cloud-based services. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 3:00 am
An important one is the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which applies to many people who have LTD benefits through their employer. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:22 am
I cover a broad range of (mostly) employment law topics on this blog - but I don't write many posts on long-term disability (LTD) insurance and benefits. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
Old Heidelberg, Ltd., the court held that an employer’s practice of tip pooling among employees was not prohibited by section 351 because the employer did not “collect, take, or receive” any part of a gratuity left by a patron, and did not credit tips or deduct tip income from employee wages. [read post]
