Search for: "England v. Medical Examiners"
Results 101 - 120
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Joshua Rozenberg, A Lawyer Writes: Unintended consequences: is the new system of medical examiners allowing GPs to dump work on coroners? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
Internet and Social Media Google is to remove private medical records from search results after people request action. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
There were pieces in The Irish Examiner and the Sunday Times. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
For decades, the courts allowed anything as long as the speaker was “an expert witness,” who uttered the magic words “reasonable medical certainty. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
(A man v WalesOnline (Clause 1), 03/05/2012) Julian Assange complained to the PCC about the description of ‘rape charges’ against him – when in fact he has not, to date, been charged with any offence – as noted in: Mr Julian Assange v The Independent (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; and Mr Julian Assange v Daily Mail (Clause 1) 03/05/2012). 164 people complained about a Sun’s columnist claims about the medical conditions ME and fibromyalgia. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
See White v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
There was also the Daily Telegraph’s sting on the then England football manager, Sam Allardyce. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
This post examines the conclusions reached in GJ and Others and the decision’s salience for India. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
The Garante found the city council was allowing the Ama to disclose the names of mothers on aborted foetuses’ gravestones without consent and ordered information burial documents and medical certificates be sealed. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
V. identified error patterns that contribute to in-patient trauma deaths. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
Hlatky, M.D. in an editorial published in the New England Journal of Medicine warned that before expanding the use of drugs like Crestor the "evidence should be examined critically". [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Medical Device: ALABAMA WOMAN DIED FROM USING BACTERIA-TAINTED IV PRODUCT, SUIT SAYS, Young v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff arrived in Montreal, Quebec, from Liverpool, England, on the S.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
