Search for: "English v. English" Results 21 - 40 of 11,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm by Unknown
(EJIL: Talk Blog, April 2024) [text]"Venezuelans increasingly stuck in Mexico, lowering illegal crossings to US," VOA News, 31 March 2024 [text]**Visit the weekly Americas Migration Brief for a much more extensive round-up of news and publications.Reports:Análisis regional de necesidades de ayuda legal: Colombia, México, Perú, Venezuela, Guatemala y Honduras (Danish Refugee Council, March 2024) [text via ReliefWeb]Declaración de la IX Reunión Plenaria del… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
The opening (A Máquina de Semelhanças/The Resemblance Machine) follows below in the original Portuguese and an English translation. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
Farmworker women, especially those with limited English proficiency, fall squarely within the category of vulnerable workers. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
  A further instance took place in a judgment handed down on 22 March 2024, in which the English Court of Appeal overturned a finding of invalidity by the Patents Court in Bamford v Manitou. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by Sarah Khan
Beware a Common Pitfall Sean Hayes Presentation to Korea Business Forum: The Korean Labour Law v. the Fourth Industrial Revolution Expanding your business into Asia? [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Oppo Daily Special In Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23, the Court considered whether implementers found to infringe a UK patent must commit to take an English Court set (as opposed to some other jurisdiction) FRAND licence. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm by Howard Knopf
Tawfik has excellent credentials and was cited twice in the landmark 2021 Supreme Court of  Canada decision of York University v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:33 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Here, the Court of Appeal attempts to justify the lack of TQJs for cost effectiveness and efficiency reasons considering the question at stake (change of language from German to the English language of the patent).Lionel MartinBut a corresponding analysis by August-Debouzy of patent litigation and public law case law appears to indicate that stepping away from the UPCA principle of 5-judge panel, including 2 TQJs, would contravene the principle of a court instituted by law protected… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Natalia Kubesch
In addition, opportunities for civil society or victim groups to intervene during criminal proceedings to advocate for compensation are limited, as highlighted in Nigeria v. [read post]