Search for: "English v. Jacobs"
Results 161 - 180
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
”This purports to follow the guidance of the General Court in Case T-152/11 “MAD” (sadly not available in English, although referred to in the current OHIM Guidelines on Proof of Use, see page 41).What is the meaning of this??! [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:01 am
The English courts could, and in appropriate cases should, determine at least the question of infringement of foreign copyright. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Take for instance the "Anywayup Cup" case, Haberman v Jackel International [1999] FSR 683. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
As Jacob LJ has pointed out in Aerotel, [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 [32], “[p]atents are essentially about information as to what to make or do. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
There was the first English “right to be forgotten” case and the most high profile case of the year was that brought by Sir Cliff Richard against the BBC. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
The current version, the English Arbitration Act 1996, applies to ad hoc arbitrations conducted in the United Kingdom. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
The current version, the English Arbitration Act 1996, applies to ad hoc arbitrations conducted in the United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
In Novartis AG v Generics (UK) Ltd (trading as Mylan) [2012] [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold of held that English contract law was controlling and that service of a notice of termination under the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:00 am
It is a recognised phenomena in patent proceedings that patents are often given a different interpretation in opposition and infringement proceedings, termed the "Angora cat" phenomena after Sir Robin Jacob's comment European Central Bank v DSS [2008] EWCA Civ 192:Angora KatProfessor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 1:43 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (UCL). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 12:39 am
Sir Robin Jacob (UCL) on 20-24 April 2020, at UCL Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
English). [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
For example, that knotty issue of evidence in trade mark proceedings seems to be a prime candidate for some further attention from the English courts in 2014. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:31 pm
Afrikaans newspapers were closely aligned with the governing National Party, while English titles were allied to the English-speaking community. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The Fourth Circuit’s approach in IRAP v. [read post]
