Search for: "Essex v. Essex"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0219, 2009 MT 380N, ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:39 am
Williams v Essex County Council: [2011] EWCA Civ 1315; [2011] WLR (D) 329 “A statement of special educational needs automatically lapsed when a person ceased to be a child, which was at 19 years. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:33 am
Essex Trading Standards v Singh; [2009] WLR (D) 81 “In order to acquit a defendant of a charge of unauthorised use of registered trade marks in relation to goods, contrary to s 92(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, under the statutory defence provided by s 92(5) of the Act, it was not enough for the [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:17 am
Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2008] UKHL 74; [2008] WLR (D) 386 “Where there was a real and immediate risk of a patient detained in a mental hospital committing suicide, art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, imposed [...] [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
New United Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:51 am
A v Essex County Council; [2010] UKSC 33; [2010] WLR (D) 184 “A local education authority which took 18 months to secure a place at one of the few specialist schools which was equipped to cope with a severely disabled child with special education needs, during which time he was unable to attend school at all, had not, by taking so much time, denied the child’s right to education contrary to art 2 of the First Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:47 am
Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust House of Lords “The right to life protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights imposed an operational obligation on medical authorities to do all that could reasonably be expected of them to prevent a patient detained in a mental hospital who was known to be [...] [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
” ALJ Essex also found that permitting Tannenbaum to withdraw would not severely prejudice Shantou and F&V or the continued progress of the investigation because they had retained other legal counsel. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:40 pm
Specifically, ALJ Essex relied on the Supreme Court’s Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:43 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 66 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Woodland v Essex County Council [2013] UKSC 66 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:44 am
Additional Resources: At least 7 injured in Georgetown wreck, April 17, 2016, The Boston Globe, By Adam Sennott More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:50 am
“On 26th October 2011 the Supreme Court gave judgment in the first Part V [civil recovery] case Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) to reach the highest court in the land.” Full story 23 Essex Street, 10th November 2011 Source: www.23es.com [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:03 pm
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainants Litepanels, Inc. and Litepanels, Ltd. and Respondents Fuzhou F&V Photographic Equipment Co., Ltd. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
Moreover, ALJ Essex observed that the ITC has previously determined that it is not required to follow the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:03 am
“Since the multitude of reflections provoked by the case of W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (CoP) at the end of last year, there have been yet more difficult end of life decisions for the Courts this year. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
Essex issued Order No. 15 granting in part Complainants’ motion to compel discovery responses from Respondents Fuzhou F&V Photographic Equipment Co., Ltd. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
Frost in Essex here Essex in Cat here Best thing about Essex here [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:06 am
ALJ Essex therefore found that resources would be more efficiently used by proceeding with the investigation. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:21 pm
Essex issued Order No. 12 denying Complainant ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies’ (“ChriMar”) motion to strike non-party Google Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
On 23 October, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of Woodland v Essex County Council. [read post]
