Search for: "Ex Parte Patterson" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
Amici Merits participation only tells part of the story, because few trends in the Supreme Court are more significant than the rise of amicus filings. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
., April 27, 2009> SETTLED · · [4-17] ABC Financial Services pays $20K to settle pregnancy/discharge suit by EEOC; EEOC PR here · · Ashley Cnty changes policy to settle EEOC ADA complaint; will no longer require ees to report possible side effects from drugsCA> DECIDED · · St Ct App: Affirms JV for $1.1M+ vs Pasadena FD for subjecting a firefighter to a fitness-for-duty examination and retiring him,… [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In fact, they don’t explain why at all — they just flat-out state, “The government’s ex parte seizure of Puerto 80’s domain name constituted a prior restraint on speech. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:37 am by Emma Snell
A battlefield map released by Russia’s Defense Ministry yesterday appeared to indicate that Russian forces had vacated all northern parts of the Kharkiv region where Ukraine is continuing to press its counteroffensive and hasn’t claimed to have recaptured. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Nye (Stagnaro, Saba & Patterson), the UCLA First Amendment Clinic had filed an amicus brief supporting that position and arguing that the court should hear the case, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
Midkiff,14 the state legislation allowed for a forced transfer of title to real property from lessors to lessees as part of a program to abolish the remnants of a Polynesian feudal land tenure system. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Jim Sedor
The murky reality of both Vance’s and Mullin’s finances can be attributed in part to the work of Sen. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce,  Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY,  Filed 15 January 2019), a federal district court determined that the Secretary of Commerce unlawfully exercised what discretionary authority the law allowed in the ways he went about directing the insertion of the citizenship question that unlawfully annoyed some stakeholders and threatened others, in part because the decision was not  "reasonable and reasonably explained. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
”11 In the context of lobbying legislatures and regulatory agencies, the Supreme Court has long regarded lobbying and advocacy for and against legislation and regulation as core political speech that is protected by the right to petition the government.12 Part of this constitutional guarantee is a freedom to associate with others to lobby for redress.13The constitutional protection is not lost by an economic or self-interested motivation in the lobbying or advocacy.14  This… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Patterson, 218 P.3d 1031, 1037 (Ariz. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[Or for that matter to women, to unmarried women, or to women based on age, race, national origin, religion, citizenship (other-"natural-born" or otherwise), and the like?] [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The moves are part of the Biden administration’s push to demonstrate it is on guard amid new voting restrictions proposed and enacted by GOP-led states across the nation, and as Democratic-led federal voting legislation has stalled. [read post]