Search for: "Ex Parte Pennington" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
This filing is part of the ICWA class action case in South Dakota over the interpretation of 25 USC 1922 (emergency jurisdiction): The third reason why this Court’s ruling on § 1922 has been inoperative is because the State’s Attorney for Pennington County, Defendant Mark Vargo, and the person Mr. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:42 pm
" Ex parte Dixie Rose Nursery, 45 U.S.P.Q. 673 (Comm'r Pats. 1940). [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeCourt Denies City's Bid for Ex Parte Filing Under Seal In Cases Over Arrests at 2004 Republican ConventionSchiller v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:43 am by Diana L. Skaggs
  On Rebecca’s subsequent ex parte motion, the ex parte order of sole custody was vacated and a hearing was held. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Following Senart, federal courts in later products cases have applied he Noerr-Pennington doctrine to bar tort claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 6:26 am
  The Complaint alleges that this NJ Municipal Court judge met in her chambers "ex parte" (without the prosecutor's presence, which could be a violation) and dismissed a "friend's" NJ traffic violation, which was a result of an NJ traffic accident. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Supp. 2d 388"Plaintiffs contend that unless the Court allows ex parte immediate discovery, they will be irreparably harmed. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16, was denied on the ground that there was no lawful rationale for proceeding ex parte, rather than on notice to (a) the students, and (b) the university.Legal challenges to ex parte discovery procedure.The ex parte discovery process is being challenged in the Boston University case, in Boston, Massachusetts, where a motion to quash and vacate has been made in Arista v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
TTAB finds DIRT DRIFTERS merely descriptive: In re Esposito (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Registration denied for GITZIT mark based on earlier identical mark for identical goods: J L Pennington v GITZIT, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Dana-Farber Cancer Institute – DFCI protests Dr Farber’s The Farber Center for Radiation Oncology (The Trademark Blog) Gosling – Discussion of… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am by Anna Christensen
§ 1973, applies to state felon disenfranchisement laws that result in discrimination on the basis of race; and (2) whether the Massachusetts felon disenfranchisement scheme established in 2000 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as applied to those Massachusetts felons who were incarcerated and yet had the right to vote prior to 2000.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (1st Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Title: Stroud v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am by Florian Mueller
The unanimously adopted 2007 joint agency Report, Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition, explained the difference between a patentee's power ex ante (when "multiple technologies may compete to be incorporated into the standard") and ex post (when "the chosen technology may lack effective substitutes precisely because the SSO chose it as the standard"). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Relatedly, various challenges to Texas voting procedures fail because of sovereign immunity (over a dissent by Judge Higginbotham, who sees a troubling erosion of the Ex Parte Young doctrine). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Heather Gonzalez
GET A COPY OF THE FREE GUIDE HERE The Benefits of Being a Freelance Paralegal I get to work part-time around my child’s schedule. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 10, 2008 Pennington v. [read post]