Search for: "Ex Parte Prior" Results 61 - 80 of 4,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
After the Civil War, thousands of ex-Confederates were disqualified from office without prior criminal convictions. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
On January 2, 2024, the court granted Chegg’s motion to file an ex parte application for a TRO and preliminary injunction under seal, to “maintain the status quo” and presumably to obtain further relief against the Defendants’ alleged evasive domain name maneuvers. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
Early reported state judicial cases holding former Confederate rebels disqualified from office did not require or suggest the need for prior criminal-law conviction. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The Commission explains that “a defendant can waive constitutional rights as part of a civil settlement. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
 For those fearing an “ex machina” future, there is an equal number of people fearing an ex-privacy future in the balance of this debate. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Furthermore, parties proceeding anonymously in this District are routinely required to reveal their true names (as well as other identifying information) to the Court ex parte and under seal. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Rich Vetstein
If there is a clear danger that the other party will convey or encumber the subject property, you can file the motion “ex parte” – that is, without the other side being notified in advance, however, do you do have to make that factual showing there is an emergency. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
The court found just such evidence here, noting that the struggle between defendant and the victim began as she fled from him at the door, then moved to the bedroom, where defendant restrained her on the bed prior to the sexual assault. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:38 am by Megan Dell
Previous Alimony or Support: Whether alimony or support has been awarded from a prior marriage. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
Later events with ex tunc effect (such as the declaration of invalidity of the prior right, or the withdrawal of the opposition) mean that, at hindsight, the decision should not have “existed”, but later events with ex nunc effect (such as revocation or non-renewal or, as in the Brexit cases, loss of eligibility as an opposing right in EUTM proceedings) do not have that result. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Nicholas Franssen
The combination of these two elements would seem to imply that the Court was not willing to accept the full implication of the conclusion of the Advocate General that it is was up to the criminal procedural law of the Member State of the handling EDP to determine whether judicial control is to take place ex ante – i.e., before the investigation measure is carried out in another Member State – or ex post, e.g. during the trial stage of the case. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
And to warrant a “voluntary intoxication” instruction, you need a little more than the ex-girlfriend saying you were “pretty drunk,” especially if you’re on camera (another camera, not the neighbor’s) looking in control of yourself. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 8:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiffs can win when someone conveys a disparaging falsehood about them, but there are numerous defenses that can force the trial court to dismiss the case prior to trial.The case is Rapaport v. [read post]