Search for: "Ex Parte Prior" Results 141 - 160 of 4,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
They are also more likely to be monitored for drugs as part of their release as well. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
They are also more likely to be monitored for drugs as part of their release as well. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller
They are also more likely to be monitored for drugs as part of their release as well. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:52 am by SOIssues
Then, the state Superior Court recently found some parts of Jessica’s Law unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:46 pm by Richard Montes
Jutkowitz, some questioned whether ex parte interviews of nonparty treating physicians were allowed only after the filing of the note of issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In Ex parte NAGAZUMI, the appellant lost: We affirm the stated rejection for substantially the reasons set forth by the Examiner in the Answer.Ex parte Frye, 94 USPQ2d 1072, 1075 (BPAI 2010) (precedential).An appellant may attempt to overcome an examiner’s obviousness rejection on appeal to the Board by submitting arguments and/or evidence to show that the examiner made an error in either (1) an underlying finding of fact upon which the final conclusion of… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
  In Arons and Kish, the Court held that opposing counsel may conduct an ex parte interview of the adversary's treating physician post-note of issue where that party puts his or her medical condition at issue (see prior post and comments). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1995).About the Rose caseEx parte ShotwellThe Appellant also contends that the holding of Rose does not apply in this case. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 3:25 am
An applicant's assertion of priority of use constitutes a collateral attack on the cited registration, which cannot be entertained in an ex parte proceeding.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Hmmm. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
Teleflex it is explained that “[h]ere ‘[an appellant] claims a structure already known in the prior art that is altered by the mere substitution of one element for another known in the field, the combination must do more than yield a predictable result,’”(p.17 Ex parte Catan).The full decision can be found here: Ex parte Catan [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:53 am by Dennis Crouch
The personal jurisdiction holding in this case will be discussed in a different post, but here I wanted to bring up the interesting facts regarding Accession's ex parte contact with the USPTO regarding Radio System's pending patent application. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From Ex parte FRAZERAs to obviousness:Obviousness requires more than a mere showing that the prior art includes separate references covering each separate limitation in a claim under examination. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 6:36 am by Christopher H. Strate
This may mean that an examiner may not apply additional prior art submitted during any reexamination proceeding against the claims subject to reexam, whether ex-parte or inter-partes. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:35 am by Dennis Crouch
In a prior post, I discussed the BPAI’s recent precedential decision of Ex parte Tanaka (BPAI 2009). [read post]