Search for: "Ex Parte Steel"
Results 1 - 20
of 239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 2:35 am
PTAB found the claims too indefinite to review an obviousness rejection in Ex parte Nielsen.The 1971 case In re Moore was cited. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
From Ex parte BarrOf written descriptionWe agree with the Examiner, and further find that the meaning of oneof the limitations of the claims cannot be determined from the Specificationand drawings. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:58 am
Thanks to the Benefit of Hindsight blog for concisely explaining Ex Parte Matsuoka (October 29, 2007) where the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences upheld the obviousness rejections of the claims of U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:04 am
From within Ex parte FukayaWhile the Examiner relies on case law for the proposition that combining known ingredients for known functions would have been obvious, the Examiner has not articulated any specific reasoning with some rational underpinning to support the legal conclusion of obviousness that addresses why one of ordinary skill in the art would have looked to JP ‘810, JP ‘729 or Lindén for metals for use in high temperature conditions to use as the metal… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:01 pm
Within Ex part INGRAMprima facie obviousness is supported by the undisputed facts mentioned earlier and by established legal precedent. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
”); In re Allen, 324 F.2d993, 997 (CCPA 1963) (citing Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
C–11–02533–(DMR).July 8, 2011.Brett Langdon Gibbs, Steele Hansmeier, PLLC, Mill Valley, CA, for Plaintiff.ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY IN PART; SEVERING DOE DEFENDANTS FROM CASE; AND ORDERING DISMISSAL OF THEIR CLAIMSDONNA M. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:15 am
The court denied defendants' motion to stay pending ex parte and inter partes reexamination of the four patents-in-suit because the potential for simplification did not favor a stay. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 1:20 pm
I blogged about this earlier at Probate judge’s ‘ex-parte‘ contacts with opposing counsel? [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 3:53 am
And we're going to say to friend and foe alike: ‘We want you to be a part of us. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:36 pm
Steele, New Jersey App. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm
In Ex parte Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., released on September 27, 2013 (summarized on our blog September 28, 2013), the Alabama Supreme Court granted the employer’s petition for writ of mandamus and held that the post-accident report was prepared in anticipation of litigation and, therefore, was considered work product and not discoverable. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm
Ex parte Adelman, Appeal 2010-011767 (BPAI 2012) As part of what seems a sign of change, the BPAI in recently refused to decide a patent appeal on statutory subject matter grounds and instead found Adelman’s claims invalid under a new grounds of rejection — indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:22 pm
After hearing Plesner's arguments, the District Court of the Hague has, with judgment dated 4 May 2011, lifted the ex parte injunction against Plesner (Dutch judgmenent here; English translation courtesy of Kennedy Van der Laan, acting for Plesner, here). [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:12 am
Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC speaks of conditions under which an Ex-Parte Decree can be set aside. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 8:34 am
Part I is available here and Part II is available here. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:46 am
On February 18, 2011, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Ex parte Salvation Army (In re: Roy Williams v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:56 pm
Fortunately, Pietz provided context by attaching the Steele/Hansmeier/Duffy ex parte application as an exhibit. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:26 pm
Edited to add: Commenter Robert points out something I missed — the "Peter Hansmeier" ex parte is just a cut-and-paste of arguments from the ex parte application filed by John Steele, Paul Hansmeier, and Paul Duffy. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:31 pm
See Ex parte Miyazaki, 89 USPQ2d 1207, 1215 (BPAI 2008) (precedential). [read post]
