Search for: "Ex parte Hodges"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
Hodges v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Michael & All Angels Bampton [2023] ECC Exe 1] [Top of section] [Top of page] Re St. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Hodges (Glen) v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeal reviewed the main authorities R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer‘), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Awua (1996) AC 55 (‘Awua‘), which concerned Part III of the 1985 Act, and Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36; (2009) 1 WLR 1506… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
EPA) but in areas like national security as well (going from Ex parte Quirin to Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Further, the question of whether the organ should be replaced and, if so, by what manner of instrument, was not part of the petition [25]. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
Mr Grundy QC (for Cambridge): acknowledges, as he is bound to do, that the clear ratio in Mohamed is that temporary or interim accommodation provided by an LHA in accordance with its HA 96 Part 7 statutory duties may count towards normal residence. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
Lord Hodge considered the appellants’ submissions. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 8:59 am
Hodges v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Sandford (1857), Ex Parte Merryman (1861) Chase Court: United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Sandford (1857), Ex Parte Merryman (1861) Chase Court: United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
More information can be found the Hacked Off Website, Parts I, II and III for more information. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
The Chinese firm will be banned from supplying kit to “sensitive parts” of the network, it will only be allowed to account for 35% of the kit in a network’s periphery and it will be excluded from areas near military bases and nuclear sites. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Giving the leading judgment, Lord Kerr (with whom Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lady Black agreed) allowed the appeal on the basis that there had been a breach of the investigative obligation under ECHR, art 2. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm
See Ex Parte KennethAndrew Hodges, No. 2014-009710, 2016 WL 6441834(P.T.A.B. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:48 am
Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 180 (1961); see also Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) (allowing injunctive relief against a state official for violations of federal law). [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
A House of Lords Committee has heavily criticised the data sharing provisions in Part V of the Digital Economy Bill; it has reported that the provisions should not be supported in their current form. [read post]
