Search for: "ExxonMobil Corporation "
Results 81 - 100
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
This post is based on an ISS-Corporate memorandum by Jun Frank. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
This post is based on an ISS-Corporate memorandum by Jun Frank. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:08 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation, 393 N.J. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:48 am
EESG Activism After ExxonMobil Posted by David A. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Voting against management-nominated directors is an important mechanism for institutional investors to convey their dissatisfaction with a wide array of corporate policies and performance. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Voting against management-nominated directors is an important mechanism for institutional investors to convey their dissatisfaction with a wide array of corporate policies and performance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:45 am
The White House Press Office was seeking to praise ExxonMobil for its investment and, while doing so, copied from ExxonMobil’s own press release seeking coverage for their efforts. [read post]
Selected reports issued by the Office of the State Comptroller during the week ending March 26, 2016
26 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
utm_source=weekly+news&utm_medium=email&utm_term=corporate+governance&utm_content=20160327&utm_campaign=pension+fund Agreements reached on Corporate Political SpendingNew York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
The state would partner with North Slope producers BP, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil and obtain a 25% ownership share of the LNG terminal. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
The state would partner with North Slope producers BP, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil and obtain a 25% ownership share of the LNG terminal. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:37 am
"The process allows for back-room deals between corporations and investors that don't need to be disclosed to other shareholders, and we see that as harmful. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
ExxonMobil’s decision to a declaratory judgment action seeking to exclude certain shareholder proposals is the most notable recent effort to bypass the no-action process. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 2:30 pm
The surprising success of activist investor Engine No. 1 in electing climate change-focused candidates to the board of ExxonMobil and the order by the Dutch court requiring Royal Dutch Shell to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 50% of 2019 levels by 2030 are just two of the recent examples of the ways in which ESG issues increasingly have come to predominate corporate agendas. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:16 am
Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita; For Whom Corporate Leaders Bargain by Lucian A. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal litigation 4. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
In so holding, Judge Wolfson rejected an argument by the defendants, including Exxon Mobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation (“Defendants”), that primary restoration natural resource damages were available only upon a showing of “an injury or threat to human health, flora, or fauna. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:35 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance by Lucian A. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
After adding Newtown Creek to Superfund’s National Priorities List last September, EPA announced earlier this month that it has reached an agreement with six potentially responsible parties (Phelps Dodge Refining Corporation, Texaco, BP Products North America, National Grid NY, ExxonMobil and the City of New York) to conduct a remedial investigation of Newtown Creek (RI) and produce a feasibility study evaluating cleanup options (FS). [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:52 pm
ExxonMobil Corporation 24,055 (La. 7th J.D.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
The other anecdote is the 2021 approval of a shareholder proposal at ExxonMobil "requiring the company to describe 'if, and how, ExxonMobil’s lobbying activities … align with the goal of limiting average global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius…'" Once again, they misdescribe the proposal. [read post]
