Search for: "FLORES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
Flores (1997). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 pm
The Trump administration has pointed to that agreement—called the “Flores settlement” after Flores v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
Flores (docket) Speaker of the Arizona House v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a petition for rehearing en banc in Sissel v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:52 am
Sebelius and follow Flores here. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Roberts], where it upheld a statute that levied property taxes in the District of Columbia to support railroad projects. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Flores v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy previews Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that human beings held in Guantanamo Bay are not considered “persons” under RFRA, and are therefore outside of the statute’s protections. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:47 am
District Court of the District of Columbia before making any changes to its voting laws. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia found that ICE was using a check-box style procedure to deny bond to respondents based solely on broad criteria, such as recency of entry, that naturally swept up everyone in custody. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm
The Corps pointed out that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am
Flores (1997). [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Attorney for the District of Columbia Michael Sherwin told reporters last week that his office “organized a strike force...whose only marching orders from me are to build seditious [conspiracy] charges related to the most heinous acts that occurred in the capitol. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
However, the United States District Court, District of Columbia did state in United States v. [read post]
