Search for: "FLOYD v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded today in Peltier v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
The case, Floyd v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am
Over at Jotwell, Reuel Schiller reviews Sarah Milov's The Cigarette: A Political History (The Cigarette and the State).The Federal Judicial Center has been "live-tweeting" Schenck v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 5:23 am
In the qui tam case of BlueWave Healthcare v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
The case of U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
Floyd v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Lee Gilliam v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Eric Garner were among the mourners. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:17 pm
In addition, the ILB has just received notice of another Transfer granted with Published Order, granted today, in the case of Floyd Tewell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
This question is posed by Floyd LJ in the introduction to the Court of Appeal decision on the Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc [2018] EWCA Civ 2211. [read post]
22 May 2020, 7:03 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Finally, Floyd LJ noted that it was not determinative that Edwards’ counsel had stated whilst cross-examining Prof Moore that a particular point would be pursued with Prof Lutter (which never happened). [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
It must be for the applicant to state clearly the type of monopoly for which he contends. [read post]
