Search for: "FR v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2021, 4:04 pm
In Thaler v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
See 86 FR 41889. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Gisvold v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:10 am
I'm on the run today, so I likely won't have time to discuss this in detail; but you can read the opinions here (McAdams v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:02 pm
[i] 80 FR 37053. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
This may be relevant in jurisdictions where state or local governments or employers continue to impose vaccine mandates on healthcare providers, staff or suppliers. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
There is a need for more patent quality in SEPs" he stated. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
And as I pointed out here, disembodied designs are already automatically (and costlessly) protected by copyright as long as they can meet the low standard of creativity mandated by Feist v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am
Rapp based his case on the 1987 US Supreme Court case Houston v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:21 pm
EPA v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:06 pm
See 2007 KSR Guidelines, 72 FR at 57,528 n.2. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The Department also has available to it a portion of certain fraud prevention and detection fees charged to applicants for H- and L- category visas. 8 U.S.C. 1356(v)(2)(A). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
All уоu knоw is thаt thе IRS is going tо tаkе something frоm уоu to ѕаtіѕfу your dеbt. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am
In the final chapter, May looks into the benefits of PDOs for different groups of stakeholders: producers, consumers, regional and state authorities. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:20 am
Corrosion Proof Fittings v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
& subrog. claims are solely BK issues not bound by State Ct holding that Bank owed Dbtr no duty http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HarbourEastDevp-BK-SD-FL-Cristol-10-27-11.pdf … B-MA: Failure to comply w/FRBP 2002(c)(3) for notice of plan injunction precludes confirmation w/injunctive provisions. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/QuincyMedicalCtr-BK-D-MA-Hoffman-11-16-11.pdf … B-MA: Plan's third party releases are… [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
”[Mayo v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
