Search for: "FRYE v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2020, 2:20 pm
Gaines v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am
”) (quoting Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendments to Rule 702); Citizens State Bank v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
(referring to Frye v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [2] Frye v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
Defendant 3M moved to exclude plaintiffs’ causation expert witnesses, in its Minnesota state court cases, under the so-called Frye standard. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:24 am
Frye (University of Kentucky College of Law). [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:04 am
Frye v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:55 am
Frye: The Visible Hand? [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:07 am
However, more recently, Florida adopted the standard advanced in Frye v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
If the state wanted to get its science in, the state had to pass muster under Frye. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:07 am
Facts: This case (Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 6:21 am
Prior to 1993, the Frye standard was the prevailing standard for admitting expert testimony, see Frye v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:44 pm
This was almost a universal standard in courts throughout the country after the Supreme Court’s 1923 decision in Frye v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
”). [3] Bench Book at 137; see also id. at 162. [4] Bench Book at 148. [5] Bench Book at 160. [6] Bench Book at 152. [7] Bench Book at 233, quoting Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
Supreme Court’s 1923 decision in Frye v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
Supreme Court’s 1923 decision in Frye v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:48 am
Facts: This case (Frye v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
In Frye v. [read post]
