Search for: "FULTON v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 7:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Amicus Brief of Indian Law Professors An excerpt: Amici write to explain how the long and shameful history of treatment of Indian children by the child welfare system in the United States demonstrates the dangers of and substantial harms inflicted by discrimination in this setting, including in particular discrimination based on the religious beliefs of government employees or agents Miigwetch to April Youpee-Roll for taking the lead! [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
On June 30, 2008,  the Fulton County Superior Court in Georgia revoked a permit for construction of a proposed 1200-megawatt coal-fired power plant in the state. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 7:20 am
Fillmore County, where the Supreme Court granted cert., vacated the judgment, and remanded the case for consideration in light of Fulton v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
The parties' Agreement says in part:[A]s a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:39 pm
  The Court of Appeals concluded that the plaintiff's experts could not state that the plaintiff's opportunity for a better result dropped by 50 percent, relying on Fulton v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
Fulton v City of Cleveland, 2019 WL 1857107 (OH App. 4/25/2019)     [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm by Zachary Spilman
Also of interest from the CAAFlog archives is this 2009 post from Marcus Fulton discussing jurisdictional issues in the wake of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 10:06 am by Howard Friedman
Patrick's Cathedral, (NY App., Feb. 6, 2018), New York state's Appellate Division sent back to the trial court for further proceedings the dispute over whether the body of Archbishop Fulton J. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
The Court could have easily GVR'd the 6th Circuit's panel, and stated that it did not faithfully apply Diocese. [read post]