Search for: "Fairchild v. Fairchild" Results 61 - 80 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court’s judgment in favor of the employer was affirmed at to both claims (Fairchild v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 3:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Note that Texas Instruments and Fairchild settled the case after the interference and before the CCPA decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Senate Bill 921, known as the “Fritz-Fairchild Act,” was passed by both legislative bodies, signed by the governor and codified in Chapter 275 of the state’s 2015 laws. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In Fairchild v Glenhaven [2002] UKHL 22, the House of Lords held that all former employers are jointly and severally liable in negligence to victims who contract mesothelioma (i.e. they each ‘caused’ the harm), provided that it can be shown each of those employers materially increased the risk of harm. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court highlighted the rule in Fairchild that stated mesothelioma is “caused” in any period in which exposure to asbestos occurs which materially contributed to the risk of contracting the disease. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:53 am
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp.'s (collectively, "Fairchild") moved in limine to preclude any reference to any pending reexamination proceeding or any completed reexamination proceeding of any asserted patent. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
    [1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v… [read post]