Search for: "Famely v. Famely"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Harry Winston, Inc. and Harry Winston S.A. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
Kennedy states that Rose's Hall-of-Fame worthiness has come under "renewed discussion" as players linked to PED use (Mark McGwire, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens) come up for Hall consideration. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Wojcik described as a major national LGBT national law conference in response to the 10th anniversary of Bowers v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:35 pm
Ross Qualcomm, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
Playboy Enterprises Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 7:05 am
Read the opinion The post CASEY BROOKS, ET AL. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:47 am
In the case of Diageo North America Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Coach Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:37 am
by Dennis Crouch Joseph Phelps Vineyards v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In Kratz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
Thomas McCarthy discusses (here) the CAFC's ruling in the INSIGNIA case, Joseph Phelps Vineyards, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:19 am
In our update to the earlier post, we noted that Justice Scalia's co-author, famed legal prose stylist Bryan Garner, had responded to Judge Posner's scathing... [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Somraj Singh, Opposition No. 91175272 (December 10, 2008) [not precedential].Opposer established the fame of its mark via testimony that it has 4,315 office in the United States, 80,00 sales associates, and a 16% market share. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 12:18 pm
…Read more Case Review: Christie’s v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 12:18 pm
…Read more Case Review: Christie’s v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
for performance enhancement isn’t considered a disqualification for the Hall of Fame. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:44 pm
Dickel Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:20 pm
Daniel Sokol Professor Daniel Crane of Cardozo Law School (of recent fame on this blog for his excellent Antitrust Antifederalism article) is filing a law professors' amicus brief in Cascade v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:10 am
We couldn't.Affirmed.Clear enough.Link: Denny v. [read post]
