Search for: "Farrell v. Farrell"
Results 161 - 180
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 4:12 pm
Landrum v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm
Mahler of Farrell Fritz in his New York Business Divorce Blog Ghameshlouy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:27 am
Additional Resources: Farrell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Farrell, at p. 327, per Sopinka J. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Farrell Henderson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
AG v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
” Citing Farrell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
U.S. antitrust law focuses “overwhelmingly” on harm to consumers, Farrell noted. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court Denies Cert in Robbins v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
– Roanoke attorney Josh Johnson of Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore on the firm’s Virginia Construction Law Update McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm
Mahler of Farrell Fritz in his New York Business Divorce Blog Will Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:57 pm
Farrell, At Calif. gay marriage trial, marriage is not the only flash point, 01/22/10 Christian Science Monitor [See also this Prospect article.]CommentaryJerry Sanders, Proud to Testify for Marriage Equality, 01/22/10 Huffington PostProtect Marriage's GC Andrew Pugno, What First Amendment? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the recent decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:01 pm
" In its judgment in McCann and Others v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:40 am
: UPP and the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 77(2) Antitrust Law Journal 587 (2011) Joseph Farrell, Fox or Dangerous Hedgehog? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 am
This week’s edition is available: Leading off this edition is Sean Carter v. [read post]
