Search for: "Favors v. Stewart" Results 41 - 60 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Stewart, suggesting that slavery was contrary to the common law and that it thus required statutory support. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Ashley S. O'Neill
Last week, a Texas state court issued a whopping judgment in favor of a former employee of FE Services LLC. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:01 am by Stewart Baker
(Stewart Baker) Will Baude’s post on commandeering  prompts me to revisit the doctrine after a twenty-year absence. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Chris Stewart (R-UT) on bill] Early criticism from left and right [Daniel Silliman, Christianity Today; Katelyn Burns, Vox] The impulse to get past Culture War enmities is to be praised, even if, alas, some of the bill’s provisions would extend the coercive reach of federal law in ways libertarians would oppose; Third Circuit panel, Judge Thomas Hardiman writing, rules in favor of atheist group challenging Pennsylvania county’s rejection of bus ads. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am by Joe Mullin
" At the same time, Stewart didn't express support for rolling back patentability in a way that would threaten software patents or coming out in favor of a blanket ban on "business-method" patents. [read post]