Search for: "Federal Cartridge Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 3:45 am
The Ninth Circuit agreed with the CCAF's objection, and, in Feder v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:39 pm
State Tax Deductions AB 37 will allow California companies to deduct business expenses on their state tax returns. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
Impression Products and other companies bought the used Lexmark cartridges and solved the microchip problem, refilling the cartridges with toner and selling the refilled cartridges at a price lower than Lexmark’s price. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
Impression Products and other companies bought the used Lexmark cartridges and solved the microchip problem, refilling the cartridges with toner and selling the refilled cartridges at a price lower than Lexmark’s price. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
ITC has ruled in favor of Hewlett-Packard over a patent infringement suit over the company’s inkjet print cartridges. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 4:21 pm
In fact, the FDA recently sent warning letters out to five electronic cigarette distributor companies following violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) including unsubstantiated claims and poor manufacturing practices. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Employees obtained (b)(4) water from an (b)(4) hose attached to a water (b)(4) cartridge on the (b)(4) water line. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:40 am
BIL actually designs and makes the multi-function printers, and it is not a party to the federal lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:17 pm
The requirement will cause taxpayers to collect names, addresses, and federal tax identification numbers for those many companies which provided goods or services in the prior tax year. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:57 pm
A California federal court earlier this month rejected many of the claims in a putative class action against Epson America Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Ryan Edmundson is the named plaintiff in a proposed class action filed against Gillette in federal district court in California alleging claims under the California’s UCL and CLRA and of express warranty. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:49 am
Other companies buy used cartridges, refill them, and sell them to owners of Lexmark printers. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:13 am
JES placed the employee with Clover Technologies Group, LLC, where he unpacked and sorted ink cartridges. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
Companies holding patent rights in certainamplifiers (AT&T, Western Electric, RCA) licensed theAmerican Transformer Company to make and sell amplifiers.The Transformer Company “was a mere licenseeunder a nonexclusive license, amounting to no more than‘a mere waiver of the right to sue. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
Federal health officials have found vitamin E acetate in the lung fluid of 29 patients diagnosed with the vaping-related illness. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:37 am
PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: If one company disparages the products of another, the second company can sue the first company for unfair competition, even if the companies are not direct competitors. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 9:43 pm
Certainly, the companies that offer online services to the public have preferences for how people will use their product, but these preferences are not and should not necessarily be federal law. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:00 am
Supreme Court has ruled 7-1 against printer manufacturer Lexmark in its case against Impression Products, a company that sells refilled printer cartridges for Lexmark printers. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 2:03 pm
Finally, representations regarding PRPI’s service as “the only” company or service providing the specified service were, in context, puffery that would have been reasonably interpreted by consumers as mere general, subjective claims.As a result of this violation of federal and coordinate state law, plaintiffs were entitled to PRPI’s profits from that time period, which was the only period for which plaintiffs met their burden of showing willfulness. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 10:10 am
Lexmark International, a technology company that makes printers and ink cartridges for those printers, has been selling its ink cartridges on the condition that they could not be refilled and resold after the initial sale. [read post]
