Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,716
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced by the clause. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced by the clause. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:36 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
All placements of insurance in the United States are generally subject to state premium taxation, but the responsible taxpayer depends on the type of insurance policy issued. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
See Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:51 am
AMCO Insurance Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:23 am
Allstate Insurance Co., ___ S.Ct. ___, 2010 WL 1222272 (March 31, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a state law prohibiting a particular type of class action does not apply in a federal court sitting in diversity. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 9:45 am
Companion Property & Casualty Insurance Co. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Lexington Insurance Co. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:02 pm
Co. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 6:03 am
Paul Reinsurance Co., LTD. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-Insureds – Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-Insureds – Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
GEICO General Insurance Co., Dist. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 2:10 pm
Excess Insurance Co. of America, 316 U.S. 491 (1942), that federal courts may and reasonably should abstain from exercising declaratory jurisdiction when the issues “can better be settled in [a] proceeding pending in . . . state court. [read post]
