Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Sonotone Corp. et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission has brought complaints and entered into consent orders under the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The core concept of value maximization, remains highly relevant. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(IP Watchdog) Making a Federal Circuit case of that? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Chattem Inc., et. al., (Docket Report) M D Florida: Difficulty determining expiration of patent requires false marking complaint to plead knowledge of expiration with specificity: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Merrill Lynch, et al. (06-1341). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
As this piece was being written, a “new arrival” is Kraft Foods Global, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
Ralph, Paco & Roberto, Inc. et al, Case No. 7:17-cv-09847 (S.D.N.Y.). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance) Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Yet others refer to concepts such as fraud and fraud on markets. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Following the long-lasting dispute against Grenade Beverage, the California federal court awarded the cat’s owner the sum of $710,001 for the copyright and trade mark infringement. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The Equustek decision, Google Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Even if this represented the only losses due to illegal access in the music industry, what reasonable person would countenance a one-third market share loss due to theft? [read post]
