Search for: "Feeney v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am
Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Feeney, Hon. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Feeney, which built on the seminal Washington v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm
State Conf. of NAACP v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 2:19 pm
” In affirming the lower court’s decision, the circuit court observed that under Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Mountain States Tel. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:31 am
Feeney, Hon. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
On 7 October 2020, Facebook announced significant changes to its advertising and misinformation policies, saying it will stop running political ads in the United States after polls close on 3 November for an undetermined period of time. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:15 am
Technical countermeasures, as opposed to calling in the cops, most practical way to fend off that new form of anti-social activity, “Zoom-bombing” [Eugene Volokh] “How the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Unconstitutionally Privileges Government Speech” [Trevor Burrus on Cato amicus brief in Supreme Court case of Barr v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:25 am
An earlier decision, Feeney v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:59 am
Supreme Court should now clarify its doctrine that all laws infringing on First Amendment freedoms be narrowly tailored [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and James Knight on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Institute for Free Speech v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
The real problem is just how narrowly, even inaccurately, Feeney J interpreted proof of damage or loss in Collins. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
In Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013), Feeney J held that this did not permit a claim for general damages for distress. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
Teresa Stanek Rea and Professor Colleen V. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Feeney, Hn. [read post]
