Search for: "Feldman v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
On April 19, the Supreme Court delivered a decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
Martin v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
Under the so-called Rooker-Feldman doctrine, federal district courts do not have appellate jurisdiction over state-court judgments. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
Feldman et al. as Amici Curiae 12–13. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:09 pm
However, this bill has been amended to instead deal with state employees’ allotment of time off for observance of religious holidays. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:03 am
Lion's Club of Albany, California v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:43 am
Case Study: Feldman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:31 am
IndiaState v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:19 am
University of North Carolina, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
As I said above, Bruen may well be the most anti-originalist opinion in history.The abortion decision, Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:34 am
Gore Concurrence Rather Than a Full-Throated Independent State Legislature Theory? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:46 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: How Bush v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:13 am
The second opinion the court relied on was Feldman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
Accepting the allegations in the amended complaint as true, the fifth cause of action failed to set forth facts sufficient to allege that those defendants’ purported negligence proximately caused the plaintiffs to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d 812, 813 [2013]; Siwiec v Rawlins, 103 AD3d 703, 704 [2013]). [read post]
