Search for: "Fells v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 8,092
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Letters, along with the representations of Cabinet Office, were clearly sufficient to establish the Letters fell within s. 12(1). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:41 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Term of probation Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County of attempted theft of a cell phone, James Earl Fells, appellant, presents for our review two issues … Read the opinion The post JAMES EARL FELLS v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
After he fell into a hole which had been cut out of a basement’s concrete floor (for purposes of installing an ejector pump), TB filed suit against Old World Quality Corp alleging, among other things, a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) – which is a state law which mandates that owners and contractors ensure that construction areas are safe and that workers are protected from harm when assigned to “elevated work sites. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:27 am by Donald Dinnie
In Eze v Adderley Body Corporate (https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2024/7.html), the court answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:54 am by Frank Cranmer
The Court concluded that his complaint did not raise a separate issue under Articles 10, 11 and 14 of the Convention and fell to be examined solely under Article 9 [62]. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:44 am by Unknown
Instead, the contract terms governed, and the claims were barred by a "no-action" clause (Chatham Capital Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
His lawyers will argue Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko fell into legal error by finding the former corporal was complicit in the murder of four unarmed Afghan prisoners. [read post]