Search for: "Fernandez v State of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2007, 12:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:33 am
Fernandez, and People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
On August 26, 2022, Lomanto filed this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
Yet, in Fernandez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 5:07 am
Fernandez and People v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:38 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:44 am
Portela, 469 F. 3d 496, 499 (CA6 2006); Fernandez-Ruiz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:59 pm
In Fernandez v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s imposing a “lesser disciplinary penalty” upon remand found to have usurped the authority of the arbitrator under the circumstancesFernandez v New York City Tr. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:30 am
" Accordingly, employers of such personnel are not mandated to pay such employees minimum wages, overtime or similar compensation related rates otherwise required by Federal or New York State law with respect to its non-professional personnel. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 5:07 am
Fernandez and People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Habeas Should Be Denied on Claim Accomplice's Fingerprints Admitted to Bolster Witness' Faulty ID
Fernandez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:26 am
Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Unfortunately, though, the high court of New York, the Court of Appeals, recently disagreed in the case of Petrone v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:25 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 8:43 am
As detailed in this post and in this New York Law Journal article (Download rattoballi_nylj_article.pdf), United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
Thompson, which asks the Court to decide “whether a law-enforcement officer, generally, is a public official” under New York Times v. [read post]
