Search for: "Ferrari v. Ferrari" Results 1 - 20 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 9:12 am by Marcel Pemsel
CJEU, Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles and EUIPO, cases C-361/15 P and C-405/15 P, para. 65). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
  Cedar, hyssop, prayer – and COVID In Wiseman v Rex [2023] EWCA Crim 1363, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) upheld the fraud conviction of the head of the Kingdom Church for selling an oil mixture that he represented would protect against or cure COVID. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm by Nedim Malovic
While the CJEU’s case law (Ferrari SpA v DU (C-720/18) EU:C:2020:854 and Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C-40/01) EU:C: 2003:145) suggest that using the trade mark for spare parts might be considered genuine use for the complete product, the evidence submitted by Ferrari did not sufficiently demonstrate genuine use of the trade mark for relevant spare parts that could be seen as equivalent to an automobile.CommentThe Board’s decision… [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
Not long after I finished reading, I felt eerily reminded of another antitrust complaint involving games, platforms (iOS), and even the subscription model (Apple Arcade): Pistacchio v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
The case shows clearly that virtual goods can also infringe in the real world.Developments in design law was discussed in relation to C-123/20 Ferrari and the question of partial design protection and infringement of a V shape on the hood of the Ferrari FXXK and in C-472/21 Monz, the curious case of design protection for the bottom of a bicycle saddle which it is argued is not generally visible in accordance with Article 3.3.a of the Design Directive. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm by Giorgio Luceri
This question was recently answered in a judgment of the CJEU in Case C-183/21 (Globus v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am by Jan Jacobi
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:52 am by Daniel Marschollek (DE)
Case: Ferrari SpA v Mansory Design Holding GmbH (Case C-123/20) EU:C:2021:889 (28 October 2021) The post Community unregistered design right may arise in part of complex product (ECJ) appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:52 am by Daniel Marschollek (DE)
Case: Ferrari SpA v Mansory Design Holding GmbH (Case C-123/20) EU:C:2021:889 (28 October 2021) The post Community unregistered design right may arise in part of complex product (ECJ) appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:52 am by Daniel Marschollek (DE)
Case: Ferrari SpA v Mansory Design Holding GmbH (Case C-123/20) EU:C:2021:889 (28 October 2021) The post Community unregistered design right may arise in part of complex product (ECJ) appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]